Skip to content
  • Solutions
    • Market Data PlatformSimplify market data management
    • BIQH ServicesStandard & managed services
    • ESG ScreeningAward-winning solution
    • 3-step ImplementationConsolidate, upgrade, unify
  • Resources
    • Use case: DekaBank’s Strategic Move
    • BIQH MDP processing overview
    • Factsheet ESG Screening
    • Factsheet Market Data Platform
    • Use case: Avoid data vendor dependency
    • Use case: Replace End-of Day Pricing Data Feed
    • Use case: Streamlining Market Data Access
    • Whitepaper: Business Case
    • Whitepaper: ESG Screening
    • View all resources
  • Blog
  • About us
    • About BIQH25+ years in the market
    • Contact usGet in touch
    • Our collaborationsIndependent, flexible, connected
    • Our vacanciesExplore career opportunities at BIQH
Get in touch
Market Data, Market Data Management

Why data format compatibility is the most overlooked risk in market data management

21 May 2025 Heather Zvinavashe

Introduction: beyond coverage, quality and attributes

When selecting a market data vendor, most organisations rely on a familiar checklist: is the coverage sufficiently broad? Are the required attributes available? Is the data accurate and up to date?

While these factors are undoubtedly important, one critical risk is often overlooked until it becomes a costly problem. That risk is data format compatibility, a seemingly small detail that can derail entire implementations if ignored. In other words, can your downstream systems process the data exactly as it is delivered?

What may appear to be a technical detail can lead to failed integrations, frustrated teams and escalating costs.

The hidden pitfall: when “good data” still breaks your system

You have selected a data vendor. The instruments and attributes align with your requirements. Test queries confirm the data is accurate. Everything appears to be in order.

Then comes the integration phase and suddenly, nothing works.

The culprit? Seemingly minor mismatches:

  • Your system expects the value ‘1’ instead of the value ‘true’
  • The system can only handle up to five decimals, but the new data vendor provides up to six decimals
  • The required date format is YYYYMMDD, but the data arrives as YYYY-MM-DD

These issues may sound trivial, but their operational impact is anything but. Manual workarounds are time-consuming, while bespoke IT fixes can be costly. No financial institution has time to redesign interfaces or data models, especially with the constant pressure of regulatory compliance. In our experience, even major financial institutions fall into this trap.

The core question to ask:

What is often missing from data vendor selection processes is one simple but vital question:
Can our systems consume the data exactly as delivered, without transformation?

This is not a question for procurement teams or vendor managers. It is a question for the people who use the data daily: developers, analysts and data engineers. Yet they are frequently excluded from the decision-making process.

As a result, organisations might end up purchasing “the right data” in the wrong format.

The BIQH approach: plug-and-play market data through unified formatting

At BIQH, we eliminate this risk by ensuring data formatting is not an afterthought. It is embedded into the core of our delivery approach.

Through our vendor-independent GraphQL API, all formatting logic is standardised to match your technical environment. This means:

  • Boolean values follow your system’s requirements (1/0, true/false or even custom mappings)
  • Decimals and dates conform to your exact precision and structure
  • No manual intervention or post-processing is required

We call this data unification. It is the key to making market data truly plug-and-play.

Examples from the field

Here are a few real-world examples where BIQH prevented data format mismatches from turning into business risks:

  • A leading European bank required values in pounds, but received them in kilograms from their new market data vendor. Like many legacy systems, their reports depended on consistent units. We automatically applied the correct transformation to ensure seamless integration.
  • Another institution experienced application crashes due to excessive decimal precision. We restricted the output to five digits, eliminating the need for any changes on their side.

Across all our clients, we apply formatting unification consistently, without altering the underlying meaning of the data. This ensures seamless delivery to every downstream system. How do we do it? Read more in our previous blog post.

Conclusion: compatibility is not optional, it is foundational

Selecting a data vendor based on coverage and accuracy is only part of the equation. Without format compatibility, even the highest quality data becomes unusable.

By embedding formatting rules into the delivery process, BIQH ensures your systems receive data that works, no matter what the delivery format of the data vendor looks like.

Avoid discovering format issues during integration. With BIQH, your market data is ready for immediate use.

Factsheet Market Data Platform
Get in touch

  • Data format
  • Market Data Management
Heather Zvinavashe

Reach out to us if you have any questions
heather.zvinavashe@biqh.com
+31 (0)33 450 50 85

Post navigation

Previous
Next

Search

Categories

  • Cloud (5)
  • ESG (21)
  • ESG Data Management (4)
  • ESG Screening (6)
  • Managed Services (4)
  • Market Data (31)
  • Market Data Management (29)
  • Market Data Spaghetti (8)
  • News (8)
  • Partner Collaboration (2)
  • Security (1)
  • SFDR (12)
  • T+1 Settlement (3)

Recent Posts

  • data patterns causing T+1 settlement failures
    T+1 settlement failures as a data problem, not a settlement problem
  • Data mapping
    Mapping as the backbone of market data distribution
  • Franz Schrandt Person of the year
    Franz Schrandt named DKF Market Data Person of the Year 2026

Tags

ESG ESG Data Management Managed Services Market Data Management Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation

Continue reading

data patterns causing T+1 settlement failures
T+1 Settlement, Market Data

T+1 settlement failures as a data problem, not a settlement problem

22 May 2026 Heather Zvinavashe

T+1 settlement is often discussed in terms of timelines, coordination and infrastructure, with a focus on whether systems can process trades more quickly and operate within a shorter settlement cycle. […]

Market Data Management Steps in 2026
Market Data Management, Market Data, Market Data Spaghetti, Partner Collaboration

Market data management in 2026: engage with the business

6 February 2026 Bernard Schut

At every market data conference, artificial intelligence is now the dominant topic. Whether it is DKF, FIMA or FISD the conversation revolves around automation, machine learning and intelligent tooling. And […]

BCBS 239 Compliance
Market Data Management, Market Data, Market Data Spaghetti

Five weak links in market data that threaten BCBS 239 compliance (and how to fix them)

4 February 2026 Bernard Schut

BCBS 239, introduced by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in 2013, has been with us for over a decade, and yet it still appears in supervisory conversations as if […]

BIQH provides market data management in the cloud. We have won multiple prestigious awards! Discover more about our Best Use of Agile Methodology, ESG Insight Awards 2024 and our Best customer service in European data management victories.

Contact

+31 33 450 5085

info@biqh.com

Maanlander 47
3824 MN Amersfoort
The Netherlands

Careers

 Explore career opportunities

© BIQH 2026. All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookie Policy