Skip to content
  • Solutions
    • Market Data PlatformSimplify market data management
    • BIQH ServicesStandard & managed services
    • ESG ScreeningAward-winning solution
    • 3-step ImplementationConsolidate, upgrade, unify
  • Resources
    • Factsheet ESG Screening
    • Factsheet Market Data Platform
    • Use case: Avoid data vendor dependency
    • Use case: Replace End-of Day Pricing Data Feed
    • Use case: Streamlining Market Data Access
    • Whitepaper: ESG Screening
    • View all resources
  • Blog
  • About us
    • About BIQH25+ years in the market
    • Our CollaborationsIndependent, flexible, connected
Get in touch
Market Data, Market Data Management

Optimize market data vendor priority with our BIQH waterfalling strategies

3 September 2024 Jan-Douwe Ekhart

Introduction:

Imagine you’re faced with a crucial decision: you need to choose which data vendor will supply your valuable market data. But how do you make the right choice? Is it about getting the best price, the highest data quality, or ensuring your dataset is always complete, even if that means compromising on quality? What if you have different requirements for each data field or group of data fields? Balancing these factors can be challenging. In this blog post, we delve into the fascinating world of “waterfalling” or cascading strategies. Here, you’ll discover how to define priorities and which four strategies can help you to consistently make the best decision.

Table of Contents

  • Scenario 1: Basic waterfalling
  • Scenario 2: Field groupings
  • Scenario 3: BIQH Waterfalling strategies
    • Strategy 1: All fields must always be filled
    • Strategy 2: At least one field must be filled
    • Strategy 3: At least this field must be filled
    • Strategy 4: Most recent data
  • Conclusion

Scenario 1: Basic waterfalling

In the basic waterfalling scenario, you use a simple yet effective approach. Imagine that data vendor A provides all the data you need, which is fantastic! But what if they miss a part of your data needs? No problem, you simply switch to data vendor B for the remaining data. If this vendor also misses some data, you move on to data vendor C, and so on. This method is not only effective but also easy to set up, as long as you have the correct entitlements of each vendor’s data, which is absolutely required. This is the simplest way to implement waterfalling, but it may be expensive as well..

Scenario 2: Field groupings

In this scenario, you have the ability to define ‘field groups’, allowing you to make clear distinctions between different groups of data fields. For example, you might treat BID and ASK datafields as one fieldgroup, and the OPEN, HIQH, LOW, and CLOSE fields as another. For the first fieldgroup, you prioritize data vendor A, then B, and finally C. For the second fieldgroup, which may be less critical and where you want to save costs, you could go directly to cheaper data vendor B. With this smart setup, you can ensure that each fieldgroup gets exactly what it needs without compromising on quality or cost. This is a powerful way to apply waterfalling to specific fieldgroups. See the example in the image below

Impression of Waterfalling in the BIQH Market Data Platform.

Figure 1: Impression of Waterfalling in the BIQH Market Data Platform.

Scenario 3: BIQH Waterfalling strategies

In scenario 3, you discover the true potential of waterfalling. This is where it gets really interesting: You can apply waterfalling not just to individual data fields or fieldgroups, but also incorporate intelligent conditions and dependencies that are precisely aligned with your specific market data needs. With these advanced “if-then” scenarios, you can develop four powerful strategies. These strategies help you bring data from data vendors into your assortment and efficiently distribute it from your golden copy database, your single version of the truth, to your applications. Strategy 4 is specifically designed to optimize data flows from your golden copy. Find out below how you can elevate your market data management to the next level with these approaches:

Strategy 1: All fields must always be filled

In this strategy, you treat each fieldgroup as a single unified set of data. Imagine a fieldgroup like BID and ASK, fields that you believe belong together and therefore should come from a single vendor. If data vendor A can only supply one of these fields, you switch to data vendor B, and if necessary, data vendor C, until you find a vendor that can fill the entire fieldgroup. This ensures that your datasets are always complete and consistent. This is a data optimization strategy.

Strategy 1: All fields must always be filled

Figure 2: Strategy 1: All fields must always be filled

Strategy 2: At least one field must be filled

In this strategy, you prioritize data vendor A as long as at least one field in the fieldgroup is filled. If all fields remain empty, you switch to data vendor B, and if necessary, to data vendor C. This means that sometimes you won’t collect all the data, but this is a conscious choice to save costs. This is therefore a cost optimization strategy.

Strategy 2: At least one field must be filled

Figure 3: Strategy 2: At least one field must be filled

Strategy 3: At least this field must be filled

In this strategy, everything revolves around a specific field within a fieldgroup that must absolutely be filled. For instance, if BID is essential and you always want to receive it, you can set this as a requirement. As shown in the example, data vendor A meets this need even if ASK is not included. However, if ASK is filled but BID is not, you would still opt for data vendor B, as BID is the leading field. This strategy combines elements of both data and cost optimization, ensuring that the most essential information is always available without unnecessary expenses on less critical data.

Strategy 3: At least this field must be filled

Figure 4: Strategy 3: At least this field must be filled

Strategy 4: Most recent data

In this strategy, you prioritize the most recent data, even if it means deviating from your preferred data vendor. This strategy is only applicable to data that is already included in your golden copy. Therefore, it is not a cost-optimization strategy, but rather about process optimization. This offers particular advantages when distributing data from your golden copy to your applications and endpoints. Here, it is not cost or quality, but the timeless of market data that is the deciding factor.

Strategy 4: Most recent data

Figure 5: Strategy 4: Most recent data

Conclusion

Choosing the right waterfalling strategy for your market data is essential to save costs while ensuring the quality of your data. When you set everything up correctly, you can define a smart strategy for each fieldgroup that perfectly matches your business-specific requirements and preferences. This enables you to operate as a true market data strategist, raising the quality of your data, lowering costs, or achieving both. The BIQH Market Data Platform provides you with the flexibility and tools to effectively implement these strategies, ensuring that your data infrastructure always performs optimally. Want to see how this works in practice? Request a demo or download our Market Data Platform factsheet. Our team of BIQH professionals is ready to help you choose the perfect strategy for your situation.

Factsheet Market Data Platform
Get in touch

  • Market Data Management
  • Providor Priority
Jan-Douwe Ekhart

Reach out to us if you have any questions
jan-douwe.ekhart@biqh.com
+31 (0)33 450 50 85

Post navigation

Previous
Next

Search

Categories

  • Cloud (5)
  • ESG (20)
  • ESG Data Management (3)
  • ESG Screening (5)
  • Managed Services (2)
  • Market Data (20)
  • Market Data Management (20)
  • Market Data Spaghetti (3)
  • News (7)
  • SFDR (12)

Recent Posts

  • Essential insights into the hidden costs of market data
  • BIQH validations easily explained
  • Duplicates reporting: the 3rd method to un-double your market data

Tags

ESG ESG Data Management Market Data Management Regulatory Technical Standards Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation

Continue reading

Market Data, Market Data Management

Essential insights into the hidden costs of market data

10 October 2025 Jan-Douwe Ekhart

You pay for market data, but who actually uses it? We all know the feeling. You’re scrolling through your banking app and spot a charge for a gym membership you […]

Market Data, Managed Services, Market Data Management

BIQH validations easily explained

17 September 2025 Jan-Douwe Ekhart

1. What is a validation and why is it important? A validation is a defined check that confirms whether incoming market data complies with agreed rules before being used by […]

Market Data, Market Data Management, Market Data Spaghetti

Duplicates reporting: the 3rd method to un-double your market data

16 July 2025 Jan-Douwe Ekhart

If you manage market data contracts or expenses at a bank or other financial institution, you have probably encountered a familiar problem: duplicate data. It is not always easy to […]

BIQH provides market data management in the cloud. We have won multiple prestigious awards! Discover more about our Best Use of Agile Methodology, ESG Insight Awards 2024 and our Best customer service in European data management victories.

Contact

+31 33 450 5085

info@biqh.com

Maanlander 47
3824 MN Amersfoort
The Netherlands

Careers

See all vacancies

© BIQH 2025. All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookie Policy